Uncyk,
Borenkind & Nadler, LLP
Uncyk, Borenkind & Nadler, LLP is no longer accepting new matters. The law firm was established in 1973 and was rated "av" in Martindale-Hubbell Lawyers Directory (its highest rating). It stopped accepting new clients in December 2013.
Please use the following contact information for attorneys formerly associated with the firm.
Eli Uncyk, Esq. and Jeffrey S. Kofsky, Esq.
(212) 400-4930
Kamerman, Uncyk, Soniker & Klein P.C.
Counselors at Law
156 Fifth Avenue, 10th Floor
New York, New York 10010
Telephone: (212) 400-4930 Telefax: (646) 873-3792
www.kusklaw.com
euncyk@kusklaw.com
euncyk@aol.com
jkofsky@kusklaw.com
Myron R. Nadler, Esq.
(212) 230-1300
BEIGELMAN / FEINER / NADLER PLLC
100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor
New York, New York 10005
www.bfnlawoffices.net
mike@bfnlawoffices.net
Alan Borenkind has retired from the practice of law.
|
For
information, please call one of our attorneys.
Sample of reported cases the firm has handled:
1. Ren-Cris Litho, Inc.
v. Vantage Graphics, 96-7802, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND
CIRCUIT, 1997 U.S.
App. LEXIS 3333, February 24, 1997, Decided, RULES OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT
OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE
RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT.,
Reported in Table Case Format at: 107 F.3d 4, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7069.
OVERVIEW: Res judicata would not
operate to bar creditor's action to pierce debtor's corporate veil if there
were formal barriers in the way of creditor presenting to a state court in one
action its entire claim.
... FOR APPELLEE: ELI
UNCYK, Uncyk, Borenkind
& Nadler, L.L.P.,
...
2. Berenson
v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service, No. 26, Docket 79-4058, UNITED STATES COURT OF
APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUIT, 612 F.2d 695; 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 9263; 80-1 U.S. Tax
Cas. (CCH) P9135; 45 A.F.T.R.2d
(RIA) 542, September 24, 1979, Argued, December 28, 1979, Decided
OVERVIEW: The court erred when it failed to comply with
instructions on the first remand, therefore the cause
was remanded for the court to determine what portion of the purchase price was
attributable solely to the tax-exempt status of the buyer.
... for
appellant. Eli Uncyk, New York City, ...
3. EPM Communs.,
Inc. v. Notara, Inc., 00 Civ.
4299 (LMM), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK,
2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11533; 56 U.S.P.Q.2D (BNA) 1144; Copy. L. Rep. (CCH) P28,135, August 11, 2000, Decided, August 14, 2000, Filed
OVERVIEW: Print publisher was not entitled to preliminary
injunction in copyright infringement action against online publisher since
defendant's selection in database was not substantially similar to that of
plaintiff's compilations.
... Myron R. Nadler, Uncyk, Borenkind & Nadler,
L.L.P., ...
4. Janus
Petroleum Co. v. United States, 94 CV 0624, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 915 F. Supp. 556; 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2297;
96-1 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) P70,052;
77 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1260, February 20, 1996, Dated
OVERVIEW: In action for excise tax refund by taxpayer,
summary judgment for taxpayer was improper because wholesale distributor, who
purchased gas on which tax imposed was paid, and who sold gas to ultimate purchaser,
was treated as only person who paid tax., UNCYK, BORENKIND & NADLER, (Eli Uncyk, of counsel), New York, ...
5. International
Distribution Centers, Inc. v. Walsh Trucking Co., No. 82 Civ.
8709 (JFK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK,
62 B.R. 723; 1986 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 30701; 1986-1 Trade Cas.
(CCH) P66,922; 14 Bankr. Ct. Dec. 1061, January
8, 1986
OVERVIEW: Plaintiff was entitled to partial supersedeas bond against non-bankrupt defendants when full
bond was far from practicable; civil contempt order was denied for lack of
clear and convincing evidence of non-compliance.
... for
Plaintiff.Simon, Uncyk &
Borenkind, New York,
...
... for
Respondents Simon, Uncyk & Borenkind
and Marc L. ...
... law
firm of Simon, Uncyk & Borenkind,
specifically, Marc ...
6. International
Distribution Ctrs. v. Walsh Trucking Co., No. 82 Civ. 8709 (JFK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 618 F. Supp. 98; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18707;
1985-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P66,665,
June 20, 1985, Reversed and Remanded, February 24, 1987.
OVERVIEW: Trucking company's
antitrust verdict upheld for transportation monopolization where evidence
supported verdict and remittitur was ordered where
jury improperly considered lost revenues not attributable to damages.
... Zoldessy,
Esq., Simon, Uncyk
& Borenkind, New York, ...
7. Federal Deposit Ins.
Corp. v. Pappadio, No. CV-83-3478 (ERN), UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 606 F. Supp. 631;
1985 U.S.
Dist. LEXIS 20610, April 18, 1985
OVERVIEW: A creditor was permitted to amend its complaint
against the debtor and related parties to add several additional fraudulent
conveyances because they were brought within six years after they were
discovered.
... for
Plaintiff.Simon, Uncyk &
Borenkind, New York,
...
8. KRAUTHAMER v. BLOCK,
No. 83 Civ. 4949 (RWS), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 587 F. Supp. 254; 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS
16981, May 4, 1984
... Katz, Esq., Simon, Uncyk & Borenkind, Esqs.,
New ...
9. Mister B Textiles, Inc.
v. Woodcrest Fabrics, Inc., 80 Civ. 6014 (CBM),
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 523 F.
Supp. 21; 1981 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10295; 213 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 661, January 5, 1981
OVERVIEW: Plaintiff owned the copyright patent because the
designer of the fabric was employed by plaintiff when she participated in
design, and, therefore, her rights in the copyright passed to her employer, plaintiff., Simon, Sussman, Uncyk, Forseter & Borenkind by ...
10. TORONTO-DOMINION BANK
v. LOMIE CASUALS, INC., No. 77 Civ. 6221, UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 1980 U.S. Dist.
LEXIS 11505, May 21, 1980
... For Plaintiff SIMON,
UNCYK & PORENKIND By: Eli Uncyk, 1180 Avenue of
the Americas, ...
11. Sunrise Undergarment
Co. v. Undergarment & Negligee Workers' Union, etc., No. 75 Civ. 5347, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN
DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 419 F. Supp. 1282; 1976 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12999; 93
L.R.R.M. 2481, September 29, 1976, Eli Uncyk, Simon, Uncyk & Jacobs, New York, ...
12. SIMON v. COMMISSIONER
OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Docket Nos. 10911-77, 10940-77, 8908-80, 8909-80, 8910-80,
8911-80, 8912-80, 15423-80, 15627-80, 19078-80, 21030-80, 1485-81., UNITED
STATES TAX COURT, T.C. Memo 1986-156; 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 445; 51 T.C.M.
(CCH) 872; T.C.M. (RIA) 86156, April 21, 1986.
... firm
with Herman Simon and Eli Uncyk and had offices at
the same address as ...
13. In re Evelyn Byrnes,
Inc., Bankruptcy No. 83 B 10433, UNITED STATES
BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 32 B.R. 825; 1983 Bankr. LEXIS 5521; 9 Collier Bankr. Cas.
2d (MB) 430, August 30, 1983
... 58 Corp.Simon,
Uncyk
& Borenkind, New York, ...
14. Dawn Joy Fashions v.
Commissioner of Labor, No. 106, COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK, 90 N.Y.2d 102; 681 N.E.2d 363; 659
N.Y.S.2d 196; 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 1350; 3 Wage & Hour Cas. 2d (BNA) 1700, April 30, 1997, Argued, June 5,
1997, Decided
OVERVIEW: When a manufacturer did not know of, encourage, or
turn a blind eye to a contractor's violation of the "homework"
provisions of the Labor Law, substantial evidence was lacking of the intent
necessary to impose civil penalties.
... 76
NY2d 416.) Uncyk, Borenkind & Nadler, L. ...
... York City
(Eli Uncyk and Jeffrey S. Kofsky
of ...
15. Morris v. State Dep't
of Taxation & Fin., No. 183, COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK, 82 N.Y.2d 135;
623 N.E.2d 1157; 603 N.Y.S.2d 807; 1993 N.Y. LEXIS 3271, September 7, 1993,
Argued, October 19, 1993, Decided
OVERVIEW: Non-resident corporation's president, who did not
reside in, but rented an apartment in New York, was not personally liable for
use tax under the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil because the
corporation itself was not liable for the tax.
... Manson
of counsel), and Simon, Uncyk & Borenkind, New
York City (Eli Uncyk of
counsel), for appellant. ...
16. Fass
v. Tax Com. of New York, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Court of Appeals of New York,
50 N.Y.2d 932; 409 N.E.2d 998; 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2490; 431 N.Y.S.2d 526, May 27,
1980, Argued, June 24, 1980, Decided
... for
appellant.Eli Uncyk and
Marc L. Zoldessy
...
17. McNeal v. New York, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Court of Appeals of New York, 30 N.Y.2d 773;
284 N.E.2d 583; 1972 N.Y. LEXIS 1320; 333 N.Y.S.2d 431, May 1, 1972, Submitted,
May 4, 1972, Decided
... Corporation
Counsel (Eli Uncyk of counsel), for motion.
...
18. Skolnick v. Goldberg,
233 [M-3514], SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT,
297 A.D.2d 18; 746 N.Y.S.2d 296; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8055, August 22,
2002, Decided, August 22, 2002, Entered, THE LEXIS PAGINATION OF THIS DOCUMENT
IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING THE RELEASE OF THE FINAL PUBLISHED VERSION.
OVERVIEW: Declaratory judgment action was devoid of merit,
and appeal from the order dismissing the action served no purpose other than
harassment and delay. Appropriate remedy for maintaining the frivolous appeal
was reasonable attorney fees.
... party
appellant. Eli Uncyk,
of counsel (Jeffrey S. Kofsky, on the brief, Uncyk, Borenkind & Nadler,
L.L.P., ...
19. Fox v. Skolnick,
1135N, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 294
A.D.2d 225; 741 N.Y.S.2d 857; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5338, May 21, 2002,
Entered, THE LEXIS PAGINATION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING THE
RELEASE OF THE FINAL PUBLISHED VERSION.
... Plaintiff-Respondent:
Eli Uncyk.
For Defendant-Appellant: ...
20. Skolnick v. Goldberg,
233, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK,
APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 291 A.D.2d 274; 737 N.Y.S.2d 601; 2002
N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1590, February 14, 2002, Decided, February 14, 2002,
Entered
... Defendant-Respondent:
Eli Uncyk & Jeffrey S. Kofsky. ...
21. Fox v. Skolnick, 4721,
SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 289 A.D.2d 87;
734 N.Y.S.2d 161; 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12052, December 13, 2001, Decided,
December 13, 2001, Entered
... Plaintiff-Respondent:
Eli Uncyk.
For Defendant-Appellant: ...
22. Phillips v. New York
State Dep't of Taxation & Fin., 84953, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE
DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, 267 A.D.2d 927; 700 N.Y.S.2d 566; 1999 N.Y. App.
Div. LEXIS 13609, December 30, 1999, Decided, December 30, 1999, Entered
OVERVIEW: In an action challenging a tax assessment, the
court determined that petitioner failed to meet his burden of establishing by
clear and convincing evidence that he was entitled to an allowance for work
performed out-of-state., Uncyk, Borenkind
& Nadler (Eli Uncyk of counsel), New York ...
23. Goldberg v. Skolnick,
2028, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 253
A.D.2d 723; 678 N.Y.S.2d 13; 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9791, September 29,
1998, Decided, September 29, 1998, Entered
... Plaintiff-Respondent: Eli
Uncyk. For
Defendant-Appellant:
...
24. In re Estate of Colby,
61012, 61013, SUPREME COURT OF NEW
YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 240 A.D.2d 338; 660 N.Y.S.2d 3; 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS
6953, June 26, 1997, Decided, June 26, 1997, ENTERED
OVERVIEW: Summary judgment was properly denied first executor
and the interested party's executor. The decedent's will and three codicils
were properly admitted to probate because evidence of undue influence by the
executrix was negligible.
... Petitioner-Respondent:
Eli Uncyk.
For Objectants-Appellants: ...
25. Dawn Joy Fashions v.
Commissioner of Labor, 74514, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION,
THIRD DEPARTMENT, 218 A.D.2d 447; 641 N.Y.S.2d 449; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS
4535, April 25, 1996, Decided, April 25, 1996, Entered
OVERVIEW: Absent strict liability, a homeworker's
possession of a garment manufacturer's product was insufficient to establish
violations of applicable statutes because the homework occurred without any
intent or knowledge attributable to the manufacturer., Uncyk,
Borenkind & Nadler, New York City (Eli Uncyk of counsel), for petitioner. ...
26.
Green Point Sav. Bank v. Kandel, 94-08193, SUPREME COURT OF
NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND DEPARTMENT, 224 A.D.2d 488; 637 N.Y.S.2d
778; 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1154, January 16, 1996, Submitted, February 13,
1996, Decided
... counsel),
for appellant. Uncyk, Borenkind &
Nadler, New York,
N.Y. (Eli Uncyk of counsel), for respondent. ...
27. In re Taubenblat, 93-04138, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, SECOND
DEPARTMENT, 197 A.D.2d 301; 614 N.Y.S.2d 250; 1994
N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5706, May 31, 1994, Decided
OVERVIEW: A lawyer's resignation was accepted because he
indicated that his resignation was freely and voluntarily tendered and that he
understood the consequences of his action, and the Grievance Committee
recommended that the court accept the resignation.
... Judicial
Districts. Eli Uncyk, New York
City, ...
28. Morris v. New York
State Dep't of Taxation & Fin., 64268, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE
DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, 183 A.D.2d 5; 588 N.Y.S.2d 927; 1992 N.Y. App. Div.
LEXIS 12139, October 22, 1992, Decided, October 22, 1992, Entered
OVERVIEW: The president of a corporation was personally
liable for a compensating use tax on boats that his corporation purchased
because the corporate veil could be pierced where the corporation was a shell
with no activity or income., Simon, Uncyk & Borenkind (Eli Uncyk of counsel),
New York ...
29. Dawn Joy Fashions,
Inc. v. Commissioner of Labor, 64442, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE
DIVISION, THIRD DEPARTMENT, 181 A.D.2d 968; 581 N.Y.S.2d 464; 1992 N.Y. App.
Div. LEXIS 4157, March 26, 1992, Decided, March 26, 1992, Entered
OVERVIEW: An action to challenge a determination of the
Industrial Board of Appeal was dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction
because the state labor commissioner was not served with the petition, and he
was a necessary party to the proceeding., Simon, Uncyk & Borenkind (James Klatsky of ...
30. Forest
Hills Residents Asso. v. New York City
Housing Authority, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York,
Appellate Division, First Department, 39 A.D.2d 64; 332 N.Y.S.2d 156; 1972 N.Y.
App. Div. LEXIS 4699, May 4, 1972
OVERVIEW: Revisions to a duly approved plan for construction
of a public housing project, involving changes to the number, design, and
height of the buildings and an increase in the number of units, did not require
resubmission to the planning commission.
... Stanley Buchsbaum
and Eli Uncyk with him on the brief; J. Lee ...
31. In re Estate of Colby,
File No. 2906/95, SURROGATE'S COURT OF
NEW YORK, NEW YORK
COUNTY, 187 Misc. 2d 695; 723 N.Y.S.2d 631; 2001 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 92, March 27,
2001, Decided
OVERVIEW: A personal representative had the right to waive a
decedent's attorney-client privilege on behalf of the estate in order to compel
decedent's attorneys to produce documents reflecting communications concerning
a corporation's value., Uncyk
Borenkind & Nadler, L. ...
32. Borenkind
v. Consolidated Edison Corp., Index #9231/94, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK,
WESTCHESTER COUNTY, 164 Misc. 2d 808; 626 N.Y.S.2d 414; 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS
194, March 28, 1995, Decided, EDITED FOR PUBLICATION, As Amended.
OVERVIEW: A utility company was not liable to landowners for
the alleged effect of nearby high voltage power lines because the landowners
presented no evidence that the authorized public use was unreasonably,
negligently, or dangerously carried out.
... City,
for defendant. Uncyk, Borenkind & Nadler, New ...
33. Talbot Typographics, Inc. v. Tenba,
Inc., Index No. 1663/90, Civil Court of the City of New
York, New York
County, 147 Misc. 2d 922;
560 N.Y.S.2d 82; 1990 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 443, July 31, 1990
OVERVIEW: A city civil court had equity jurisdiction over a
creditor's action for rescission of a transaction from a debtor to another
party and to declare that transfer ineffective because the amount in
controversy was within the statutory limitations.,
Simon, Uncyk & Borenkind
for defendants. ...
34. W. v. F., [NO NUMBER
IN ORIGINAL], Family Court of New York,
New York County, 107 Misc. 2d
531; 435 N.Y.S.2d 259; 1981 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2061, January 15, 1981
OVERVIEW: Consistent with the Uniform Support of Dependents
Law where certificate for change in child support was transmitted to a
responding court, the responding court had the duty to determine whether under
its law the parent was required to pay support., Simon, Sussman,
Uncyk, Forsetter & Borenkind for ...
35. Jade Press, Inc. v.
Packard, [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Civil Court of the City of New York, Special
Term, New York County, 91 Misc. 2d 820; 398 N.Y.S.2d 785; 1977 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS
2422, June 16, 1977
OVERVIEW: A seller was not entitled to a grant of summary
judgment in her action against an escrow agent because the court was prohibited
from inquiring into the bona fides of the dispute because arbitration was
sought.
... pro
se.Simon, Uncyk &
Jacobs for plaintiff. ...
36. People v. Sybil
Holding Corp., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate
Term, First Department, 70 Misc. 2d 798; 334 N.Y.S.2d 810; 1972 N.Y. Misc.
LEXIS 2228, February 10, 1972, See People v. Sybil Holding Corp., 64 Misc 2d 693.
... Stanley
Buchsbaum and Eli Uncyk of
counsel), for respondent. ...
37. Kulick
v. Department of Revenue, SC No. 26841, SUPREME COURT OF OREGON, 290 Ore. 507;
624 P.2d 93; 1981 Ore. LEXIS 686, October 6, 1980, Argued and submitted,
February 18, 1981
OVERVIEW: Because a corporation chose the S corporation
status pursuant to incorporation in Oregon, the shareholders were subject to
Oregon state income taxes and the tax did not violate due process
requirements., Eli Uncyk, New York, argued the ...
... Prineville, and Simon,
Sussman, Uncyk, Forseter & Borenkind, New ...
38. Kulick
v. Department of Revenue, OREGON TAX COURT, 7 OTR 471;
1978 Ore. Tax LEXIS 43, July 12, 1978, Decision for defendant rendered.
OVERVIEW: Nonresident shareholders of a resident
S-corporation were subject to personal income tax on the distributed and
undistributed taxable income of the corporation; the constitution did not bar
the assessment of the tax.
... Herman Simon and Eli Uncyk, Simon, Uncyk & Jacobs, New York ...
|
|
|